It is a frontal challenge to men's authority and the prevailing knowledge of the time. Like a professional essay writer, this effective assault is given forth in a startlingly detailed and gutturally agonizing first-hand description of an individual's psychotic breakdown. The argument: Society's treatment of women is directly antagonistic to their well-being, treating them more like captives than citizens, and, as a result, is detrimental to society's growth as a whole.
To see the story's deep-seated argument, we must first comprehend the principles that are directly assaulted. The main plot is around a woman who is prescribed social rest as a treatment for neurotic sadness. This social rest is characterized by hourly medication, forced feedings, and, most significantly, relatively limited interaction with other people. In “The Yellow Wallpaper,” the main character can only speak to her husband and sister.
She is also restricted in her movements, spending the duration of the story on the upper floor of a big estate. She is meant to feel as if she has little knowledge and that she should be grateful to her spouse, who is the physician, who suggested this regiment, for spending the effort and time to help her. All you have to do is approach an essay writing service and ask them “I need someone to write my essay?”, they will get back to you in time and provide you with an amazing paper.
In John vs. Narrator, we see the narrator pushed against multiple groups representing cultural norms: Husband vs. Wife, Doctor vs. Patient, Socially Appropriate Lady vs. New Lady in Narrator vs. Jennie, Active New Woman vs. Passive New Woman in Narrator vs. Jennie.
The New Woman vs. The Society is present in all of these confrontations and is, at its core, the subject under attack. These tensions are so expertly woven within the texts that we should exercise caution in prying them out with the sensitive vocabulary we have been given.
As a result of the ridiculousness of the culture's challenge, the argument becomes one of social stagnation vs social advancement. According to WriteMyEssay.help, the characters who have arrayed against the protagonist share the same philosophy as the general culture of the time. Men are superior to women; men are masters, while women are servants; men are intelligent, while women are emotional; men are rational, while women are irrational.
From the first lines, we are transported to a fairly distinct world that invites us back to a time when men and women held a considerably more secure position in the social realm. Because of "legal difficulties" between heirs and coheirs, this estate is in shambles.
The upheaval in John's and our protagonist's lives is caused by this type of familial strife. Once this difficulty is introduced, we may begin to decipher the underlying symbolism given by the text. Our protagonist is about to go on a journey, during which the institution will alter the family structure fundamentally. She's being kept in the dark since she's been secluded.
Her treatment of ostracism as a result of her exclusion from society becomes the institutional mechanism for change. The power structure of the family will change.
Author’s Note: It’s never easy to ask somebody for help, so when I write my essay, I make sure to ask someone to proofread it.
This civilization has made the lady a prisoner. She is the woman in question. She is a detainee. These parallels aren't by chance. She continues, "This is only known and seen at night, in the dark." The rhythms of daily living in America obscure these cultural aspects. These tendencies allow men to rule culture by excluding women from the equation and restricting them to the domestic responsibilities dictated by millennia of power.
The narrator explains immediately after the aforementioned sentence that she spends a lot of time in sleep and that John created this habit by forcing her to lay down for a while after each meal. Something seemingly innocuous, such as a short snooze after a meal, might blossom into a lengthy period of detention. John restricts his wife not just to the single room inside the house, but also to the bed inside that room, by slowing down and lengthening the resting period.
Even in this strangled life, or as a result of it, the speaker develops a keener awareness of her pain and transforms it into a passionate, if unreasonable, fixation. Here we begin to perceive the societal narrative that has been obscured by the surface story's dementia. When we disentangle the two, a curious thing occurs: social critique becomes a concentrated attack on social standards.
It has been brought to our attention that this is occurring to many more women and that they are fighting back, but only in the dark, only in places where they are not visible to the public. When they are placed in the spotlight, they come to a halt and appear to be calm, then when the lights are removed, they vigorously shake the cells of their jail. She is attempting to break through, but the pattern, culture, and institutions are far too strong.
Then there's a remark that's frequently misinterpreted: "I believe that's why it has many heads." This does not imply that the subordinate patterns have numerous heads; rather, it implies that the pattern, at the upper level, has numerous heads to prevent these women and their thoughts from escaping into society. Gilman then adds, "If those heads were masked or removed, it would not be nearly as horrible."